Elizabeth Mandlik vs Renata Zarazua Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Nov at 06:40 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Mandlik vs R. Zarazua

USA
0
Win
Played
2
Win

MEX
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Mandlik 0 - 2 Zarazua
They have played 4 sets in total, with Elizabeth Mandlik winning 0 and Renata Zarazua winning 4. The last match between Renata Zarazua and Elizabeth Mandlik was at the Austin 125 - Austin, 07-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Renata Zarazua getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mandlik | 0 |
| Zarazua | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Austin 125 - Austin(11-07-25)
(QF) Argentina Open - Buenos Aires(12-02-23)
E. Mandlik vs R. Zarazua H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $317,135 | Career Prize Money | $1,047,806 |
| 56.66% (200-153) | Career Total W/L | 57.74% (403-295) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 9 | Titles | 10 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.04% (10-17) |
E. Mandlik vs R. Zarazua Match Preview:
- Who has the edge in recent second serve performance? Renata Zarazua, with a success rate of 40.16%, slightly outperforms Elizabeth Mandlik, who stands at 38.61%.
- In terms of returning second serves, Elizabeth Mandlik holds an advantage, capturing 53.17% of her opponent's points compared to Zarazua's 49.03%.
- Looking at first serve returns, Renata Zarazua shows greater effectiveness, having a return rate of 36.93% while Mandlik reaches 34.16%.
- Zarazua is more resilient under pressure, saving 50.70% of breakpoints faced compared to Mandlik’s 44.91%.
- Who demonstrates a better overall win percentage over the last year? Elizabeth Mandlik edges out with 62.07% compared to Zarazua's 59.72%.
- Their best surface for Zarazua is I.hard at 62% victories, while Mandlik excels on Grass, achieving a 62% win rate as well.
- On the Challenger/ITF circuit, Zarazua has a higher win percentage at 78.13%, compared to Mandlik's 68.00%.
- In head-to-head competition, Zarazua has won all encounters against Mandlik, leading 1-0 in matches and 2-0 in sets.
- Who has faced tougher competition? Zarazua has faced players with an average rank of 209.24, while Mandlik's opponents have averaged a rank of 300.09.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Mandlik performs better, winning 52% of such sets compared to Zarazua's 41%.
Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):
Renata Zarazua's slightly superior performance on second serves and her resilience in saving breakpoints give her a valuable edge. Her ability to win head-to-head encounters adds to her favorable outlook.
Elizabeth Mandlik's stronger record in deciding sets shows she's a tougher competitor when matches extend. However, her head-to-head performance against Zarazua hasn't been favorable.
Given these factors, Renata Zarazua appears to be the more likely winner in their upcoming match, especially considering her overall consistency and head-to-head history against Mandlik.
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Renata Zarazua Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Mandlik vs R. Zarazua H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 11 | Games Won | 25 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:33:8 | Average Match Time | 1:33:8 |
| 56% (61/108) | 1st Serve % | 77% (99/128) |
| 51% (31/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (58/99) |
| 34% (16/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 58% (11/19) |
| 42% (54/128) | Return Points Win % | 56% (61/108) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Mandlik Recent Matches Played
R. Zarazua Recent Matches Played

E. Mandlik vs R. Zarazua Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.66% (200/153) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.74% (403/295) |
| 55.41% (456/367) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.09% (898/703) |
| 52.86% (3998/3565) | Games Win/Loss | 52.71% (7634/6849) |
| 59.28% (115/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.52% (176/141) |
| 54.96% (72/59) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.48% (202/132) |
| 12.50% (1/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.26% (16/11) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 572 | Aces Total | 340 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1505 | Total Double Faults | 1240 |
| 1:33:5 | Average Match Time | 1:32:6 |
| 391.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 475.08 |
| 56% (12849/22906) | 1st Serve % | 73% (29637/40715) |
| 63% (8031/12849) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (17079/29637) |
| 45% (4491/10056) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5216/11077) |
| 52% (1540/2987) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2704/5483) |
| 48% (10931/22928) | Return Points Win % | 47% (19576/41321) |
| 47.83% (11/12) | Slam W/L | 42.42% (14/19) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Masters W/L | 35.71% (10/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 50.00% (23/23) | Main Tour W/L | 42.47% (31/42) |
| 56.60% (120/92) | Challenger W/L | 60.49% (297/194) |
| 72.41% (42/16) | Futures W/L | 75.44% (43/14) |
| 56% (197/349) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (395/689) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 38% (25/66) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (70/143) |
| 51% (62/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (111/208) |
| 86% (195/168) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (376/335) |
| 14% (195/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (376/41) |
| 20% (158/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (322/68) |